tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30618809.post4801864511487796513..comments2023-11-22T01:09:46.040-08:00Comments on myartspace>blog: Public Debate #1Brian Skibahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03707398699208090454noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30618809.post-14631474331833376972007-06-20T18:44:00.000-07:002007-06-20T18:44:00.000-07:00Article about LUCORE hits AP PRESSby AnonymousArti...Article about LUCORE hits AP PRESS<BR/>by Anonymous<BR/>Article About LUCORE hits AP PRESSArticle about LUCORE hits AP PRESS <BR/><BR/>Rising star in the digital art world<BR/>Posted: Friday, Jun 08, 2007 - 10:53:09 pm MDT<BR/>By CANDACE CHASE <BR/>The Daily Inter Lake<BR/><BR/><BR/>Dale Lucore proves that great art springs from the quality of the artist, not the value of his equipment — even forAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30618809.post-33880643182851989222007-06-12T07:31:00.000-07:002007-06-12T07:31:00.000-07:00That art is not one consensus, one meaning or one ...That art is not one consensus, one meaning or one sensibility, does not mean anything goes. It is simply a consequence of a process where the boundaries defining certain practices as artistic are drawn and redrawn. Contemporary art is art defined by the erasure of medium specificity and consequently the erasure of a certain visibility of art as a distinct practice. This does not make art extinct,Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30618809.post-2632976230228085082007-06-09T06:53:00.000-07:002007-06-09T06:53:00.000-07:00It seems the essence of this issue is that Mr. San...It seems the essence of this issue is that Mr. Sandbeck believes anything someone creates may be called art. On the other hand I completely disagree. Others may see this issue as a matter of extent. Mr. Sandbeck can have his own opinions, but he cannot have his own facts. To provide a context for this debate, I would encourage readers to first examine the works shown on our respective web sites. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com